B1 at chain length k=3, all corpora, at the mining floor.
Rule.B1 — one-sided: emotion B rises by >=T; the other axis is unconstrained Source. trajectories_v5.parquet | Family. rule x chain length Sampled from 1,327,006 matching rows, without replacement across the family, so no two tiers reuse a chain.
How to read a Script. Each chunk is one line:
a short tag of what the models heard in that clip, then the words spoken.
(underlined, plain ·
delivery, style) — the tag before the words. Emotions first, then how
it is delivered. Underlined descriptors are the ones that change across this chain
— anything identical on every clip is pulled out and stated once above, because a
value that never moves says nothing about a trajectory.
(ahem) — brackets inside the words
are a different thing: a real non-speech sound, printed where it happens. Most clips have
none; about a quarter do.
The full generated caption for any clip is still there, under
“full caption & clip details”. Its perceived-gender and background-noise
clauses were re-rendered from the numeric buckets, because the versions stored in the
corpus index had those two ladders running backwards.
The emotion clause has been re-derived, and it used to be wrong. The 40 emotion heads are not on a common scale — Interest has a median of 2.08 and is never zero, while Infatuation is zero on 87.7 % of clips — and the caption named an emotion whenever its raw score cleared an absolute 1.0. Interest therefore appeared in 94.8 % of captions and Sadness in almost none: the clause was reporting the scale of the head, not the emotion of the clip. An emotion is now named only when it lands in the top 10 % for that emotion, against a pooled tie-aware mid-rank ECDF over 132,833,726 utterances spanning every dataset and language. Interest now appears in 6.2 %, all 40 emotions occur, and a clip that is ordinary on all 40 says “no dominant emotion” rather than being forced to pick one (21.8 % of clips). This is the same scale the trajectory miner selects on, so the caption and the mining now refer to the same quantity: the mined target emotion is named in the final clip's caption on 73 % of chains, up from 46 %.
Sexual Lust ↑ (unconstrained axis: Pain)k-B1-k3 · #1
This chain comes from the one-sided rule: only Sexual Lust had to get where it was going, by at least 0.25. The other emotion was left completely free.
The chain starts with Sexual Lust around average — 0.54, higher than 54 % of clips in this corpus — and ends with it at the very top of the corpus at 0.92, higher than 92 % of clips in this corpus. That is a total rise of 0.39.
Nothing was asked of the other axis, and in fact Pain barely moves at all, sitting near 0.90 throughout.
It takes 3 clips to get there. Clip to clip the moves are +0.16, then +0.23 — an even, steady climb — each clip carries about the same share.
No single step is larger than the 0.25 cap, which is exactly what stops this being a jump cut: the change has to be spread across the clips instead of landing all at once.
Same speaker? No similarity score is available here — the emolia clips in this chain are not covered by either speaker-embedding store. The chain therefore rests on the corpus's own speaker/track labelling, which is not the same as a measured check.
Voice consistency: these clips are separate recordings joined together, and no voice-similarity check could be run for this sample, so there is no measurement of how closely the voices match. You may hear the voice shift between segments. Voice conversion has not been applied yet in this build. A planned pass will re-render every segment onto the first segment's voice, which removes this effect entirely.
3 clips · 14 s · en · emolia
hear it un-normalised (raw levels, max seam 1.4 dB)
k 3d_a 0.013d_b 0.385step_a 0.859step_b 0.226min_cos_consec —min_cos_anchor —dataset emolialang enspeaker EN_J0oTYbacO4Etrack EN_J0oTYbacO4Etotal 14.3slevel spread 1.4 dBmax seam 1.4 dB
Script — 3 chunks, 0 with a non-speech sound
Unchanged across all 3 clips: a young adult feminine voice · neutral-toned, slightly bright, fairly smooth, balanced body, good recording, normal-paced, normally alert, slightly relaxed
(casual, monologue)And the hypothalamus arouses the autonomic nervous system. Your body begins to reserve fluids.
full caption & clip details
A young adult feminine voice; delivery is normally alert, normal-paced, slightly relaxed, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, slightly bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; clear, little disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is mildly positive, neutral stance, neutral openness; no dominant emotion; style: casual, monologue; good recording, quiet background; genuineness 2.1/6; vocal-burst blend 0.6/10; 6.8s, EN.
EN_J0oTYbacO4E_W000072 · in -18.5 dBFS · gain -1.5 dB · emolia-00574
(disgust, emotional numbness· monologue, casual)And controls the release of saliva, tears, and gastric acid.
full caption & clip details
A young adult feminine voice; delivery is normally alert, normal-paced, slightly relaxed, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, slightly bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; clear, little disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is mildly positive, neutral stance, slightly guarded; reads as disgust, emotional numbness; style: monologue, casual; good recording, no background noise; genuineness 1.1/6; vocal-burst blend 2.3/10; 3.8s, EN.
EN_J0oTYbacO4E_W000073 · in -17.4 dBFS · gain -2.6 dB · emolia-00574
(sexual lust, pain· casual, monologue)It creates cortisol, which actually assists your blood and clotting.
full caption & clip details
A young adult feminine voice; delivery is normally alert, normal-paced, slightly relaxed, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, slightly bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; clear, little disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is mildly positive, neutral stance, neutral openness; reads as sexual lust, pain; style: casual, monologue; good recording, no background noise; genuineness 2.2/6; vocal-burst blend 2.6/10; 3.5s, EN.
EN_J0oTYbacO4E_W000074 · in -18.8 dBFS · gain -1.2 dB · emolia-00574
This chain comes from the one-sided rule: only Contempt had to get where it was going, by at least 0.25. The other emotion was left completely free.
The chain starts with Contempt clearly present — 0.70, higher than 70 % of clips in this corpus — and ends with it at the very top of the corpus at 0.95, higher than 95 % of clips in this corpus. That is a total rise of 0.25.
Nothing was asked of the other axis, and in fact Relief drifts down from 1.00 to 0.53 (-0.46), which the rule did not require.
It takes 3 clips to get there. Clip to clip the moves are +0.25, then +0.01 — most of the change happening immediately, then levelling off.
No single step is larger than the 0.25 cap, which is exactly what stops this being a jump cut: the change has to be spread across the clips instead of landing all at once.
Same speaker? The least similar clip scores 0.73 against the first clip, where 1.00 would mean an identical voice. That is below the 0.80 threshold the mining used — treat the “same speaker” claim here with caution. Neighbouring clips score at worst 0.73 against each other.
Voice consistency: these clips are separate recordings joined together and the match is loose (0.73, under the 0.80 threshold), so the voice may audibly change between segments. Voice conversion has not been applied yet in this build. A planned pass will re-render every segment onto the first segment's voice, which removes this effect entirely.
3 clips · 47 s · en · podcast
hear it un-normalised (raw levels, max seam 0.3 dB)
k 3d_a -0.462d_b 0.254step_a 0.495step_b 0.246min_cos_consec 0.7318min_cos_anchor 0.7318dataset podcastlang enspeaker 670383track 670383total 47.4slevel spread 0.7 dBmax seam 0.3 dBcos from recomputed from spkemb_traj
Script — 3 chunks, 3 with a non-speech sound
Unchanged across all 3 clips: a young adult feminine voice · slightly bright, quiet background, energised, neutral tension, moderately variable, wide pitch range, normal breath
(relief, astonishment surprise, triumph · normal-paced, some disfluency, average clarity, casual)we (surprised gasp) uh we understood that Shep was good because people were like when he came back, people were like, (surprised gasp) Oh, is that Shep? Like, it was like stuff like that. But with Flip.
full caption & clip details
A young adult feminine voice; delivery is energised, normal-paced, neutral tension, moderately variable; timbre is slightly cool, slightly bright, fairly smooth, thin; average clarity, some disfluency, wide pitch range, normal breath; affect is positive, slightly dominant, neutral openness; reads as relief, astonishment surprise, triumph; style: casual, conversational; average recording, quiet background; mildly explicit content; genuineness 4.9/6; vocal-burst blend 5.3/10; 11.0s, EN.
670383_00326648 · in -18.5 dBFS · gain -1.5 dB · podcast-00991
(affection, thankfulness gratitude, infatuation·brisk, some disfluency, average clarity, conversational)connected well. And I think in your defense, not coming down on you, (ahem) uh, but I feel like you love this movie so much and you've seen it so much to where and you know enough about basketball to
full caption & clip details
A young adult feminine voice; delivery is energised, brisk, neutral tension, moderately variable; timbre is neutral-toned, slightly bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; average clarity, some disfluency, wide pitch range, normal breath; affect is positive, slightly dominant, neutral openness; reads as affection, thankfulness gratitude, infatuation; style: conversational, casual; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 4.6/6; vocal-burst blend 6.0/10; 12.2s, EN.
670383_00330488 · in -18.2 dBFS · gain -1.8 dB · podcast-03183
(contempt, amusement, sourness·normal-paced, frequent disfluency, somewhat unclear, casual)does not know basketball, who's only seen who's seen this for like the first time, it was just like I'm very confused on who is who and what is what and why is why so you know but let's let's go to (low mumble) um let's talk about (low mumble) um the tournament
full caption & clip details
A young adult feminine voice; delivery is energised, normal-paced, neutral tension, moderately variable; timbre is neutral-toned, slightly bright, slightly rough, slightly thin; somewhat unclear, frequent disfluency, wide pitch range, normal breath; affect is positive, slightly submissive, neutral openness; reads as contempt, amusement, sourness; style: casual, conversational; below-average recording, quiet background; mildly explicit content; genuineness 4.6/6; vocal-burst blend 4.3/10; 23.9s, EN.
670383_00332176 · in -17.9 dBFS · gain -2.1 dB · podcast-00283
This chain comes from the one-sided rule: only Fatigue Exhaustion had to get where it was going, by at least 0.20. The other emotion was left completely free.
The chain starts with Fatigue Exhaustion around average — 0.57, higher than 57 % of clips in this corpus — and ends with it strongly present at 0.87, higher than 87 % of clips in this corpus. That is a total rise of 0.30.
Nothing was asked of the other axis, and in fact Contemplation drifts down from 0.75 to 0.48 (-0.27), which the rule did not require.
It takes 3 clips to get there. Clip to clip the moves are +0.14, then +0.16 — an even, steady climb — each clip carries about the same share.
No single step is larger than the 0.25 cap, which is exactly what stops this being a jump cut: the change has to be spread across the clips instead of landing all at once.
Same speaker? No similarity score is available here — the emolia clips in this chain are not covered by either speaker-embedding store. The chain therefore rests on the corpus's own speaker/track labelling, which is not the same as a measured check.
Voice consistency: these clips are separate recordings joined together, and no voice-similarity check could be run for this sample, so there is no measurement of how closely the voices match. You may hear the voice shift between segments. Voice conversion has not been applied yet in this build. A planned pass will re-render every segment onto the first segment's voice, which removes this effect entirely.
3 clips · 20 s · zh · emolia
hear it un-normalised (raw levels, max seam 0.4 dB)
k 3d_a -0.270d_b 0.303step_a 0.275step_b 0.163min_cos_consec —min_cos_anchor —dataset emolialang zhspeaker ZH_B00017_S08426track ZH_B00017_S08426total 19.6slevel spread 0.6 dBmax seam 0.4 dB
Script — 3 chunks, 0 with a non-speech sound
Unchanged across all 3 clips: an adult masculine voice · neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body, no background noise, normally alert, slightly relaxed, no disfluency
An adult masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, measured, slightly relaxed, steady; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; clear, no disfluency, fairly narrow pitch, light breath; affect is neutral, neutral stance, slightly guarded; no dominant emotion; style: monologue, formal; average recording, no background noise; genuineness 0.3/6; vocal-burst blend 3.0/10; 9.7s, ZH.
ZH_B00017_S08426_W000065 · in -19.8 dBFS · gain -0.2 dB · emolia-03447
Infatuation ↑ (unconstrained axis: Sexual Lust)k-B1-k3 · #4
This chain comes from the one-sided rule: only Infatuation had to get where it was going, by at least 0.20. The other emotion was left completely free.
The chain starts with Infatuation around average — 0.51, right about the corpus median — and ends with it strongly present at 0.78, higher than 78 % of clips in this corpus. That is a total rise of 0.28.
Nothing was asked of the other axis, and in fact Sexual Lust drifts down from 0.82 to 0.01 (-0.81), which the rule did not require.
It takes 3 clips to get there. Clip to clip the moves are +0.06, then +0.22 — a slow start, with most of the change arriving in the final step.
No single step is larger than the 0.25 cap, which is exactly what stops this being a jump cut: the change has to be spread across the clips instead of landing all at once.
Same speaker? Not directly measured. What does exist is a timbre similarity of 0.91 against the first clip, which describes how alike the voices sound rather than whether they are the same person. It sits on a different scale from the identity check (corpus-wide the timbre numbers run much higher), so it cannot be read against the 0.80 identity threshold and is given here without a pass or fail.
Voice consistency: these clips are separate recordings joined together. Speaker identity was not measured for this sample; the available timbre similarity of 0.91 says the voices sound broadly alike but is not a same-person check. You may notice the voice shift between segments. Voice conversion has not been applied yet in this build. A planned pass will re-render every segment onto the first segment's voice, which removes this effect entirely.
3 clips · 14 s · zh · emolia
hear it un-normalised (raw levels, max seam 0.6 dB)
k 3d_a -0.809d_b 0.277step_a 0.588step_b 0.216min_cos_consec —min_cos_anchor —dataset emolialang zhspeaker ZH_B00022_S07121track ZH_B00022_S07121total 13.9slevel spread 0.6 dBmax seam 0.6 dB
Script — 3 chunks, 0 with a non-speech sound
Unchanged across all 3 clips: a young adult masculine voice · neutral-toned, fairly smooth, balanced body, no background noise, normally alert, slightly relaxed, no disfluency, moderate pitch range
This chain comes from the one-sided rule: only Longing had to get where it was going, by at least 0.25. The other emotion was left completely free.
The chain starts with Longing clearly present — 0.61, higher than 61 % of clips in this corpus — and ends with it at the very top of the corpus at 0.97, higher than 97 % of clips in this corpus. That is a total rise of 0.36.
Nothing was asked of the other axis, and in fact Thankfulness Gratitude drifts down from 0.76 to 0.24 (-0.52), which the rule did not require.
It takes 3 clips to get there. Clip to clip the moves are +0.11, then +0.24 — a fairly even climb, though some clips carry more of the change than others.
No single step is larger than the 0.25 cap, which is exactly what stops this being a jump cut: the change has to be spread across the clips instead of landing all at once.
Same speaker? No similarity score is available here — the emolia clips in this chain are not covered by either speaker-embedding store. The chain therefore rests on the corpus's own speaker/track labelling, which is not the same as a measured check.
Voice consistency: these clips are separate recordings joined together, and no voice-similarity check could be run for this sample, so there is no measurement of how closely the voices match. You may hear the voice shift between segments. Voice conversion has not been applied yet in this build. A planned pass will re-render every segment onto the first segment's voice, which removes this effect entirely.
3 clips · 27 s · zh · emolia
hear it un-normalised (raw levels, max seam 0.4 dB)
k 3d_a -0.522d_b 0.356step_a 0.614step_b 0.242min_cos_consec —min_cos_anchor —dataset emolialang zhspeaker ZH_B00052_S04527track ZH_B00052_S04527total 26.6slevel spread 0.4 dBmax seam 0.4 dB
Script — 3 chunks, 1 with a non-speech sound
Unchanged across all 3 clips: a young adult feminine voice · neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body, no background noise, measured, normally alert, slightly relaxed
(steady, no disfluency, monologue, formal)虚发洁白的老人，和蔼的笑了笑，和自己的老伴披上外衣，径直走了出去。
full caption & clip details
A young adult feminine voice; delivery is normally alert, measured, slightly relaxed, steady; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; clear, no disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is neutral, neutral stance, slightly guarded; no dominant emotion; style: monologue, formal; good recording, no background noise; genuineness 0.0/6; vocal-burst blend 1.5/10; 5.8s, ZH.
ZH_B00052_S04527_W000042 · in -14.9 dBFS · gain -5.1 dB · emolia-03799
(pain·fairly steady, no disfluency, monologue, narration)就在两个老人就要打开木门的时候，李雪梅轻轻放下怀中的小婴儿身影闪动，和金砖一起在远方，静静的看着刺啦。
full caption & clip details
A young adult feminine voice; delivery is normally alert, measured, slightly relaxed, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; clear, no disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is neutral, neutral stance, slightly guarded; reads as pain; style: monologue, narration; good recording, no background noise; genuineness 0.2/6; vocal-burst blend 3.8/10; 9.8s, ZH.
ZH_B00052_S04527_W000043 · in -14.4 dBFS · gain -5.5 dB · emolia-03799
(longing, contemplation, sadness· fairly steady, some disfluency, whispered, monologue)(ahem) 木门被打开了，两个老人，却并没有看到什么人，只看见一个还在襁褓之中的婴儿，正放在自己家的门前，嗯，是一个婴儿。
full caption & clip details
A young adult feminine voice; delivery is normally alert, measured, slightly relaxed, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; clear, some disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is neutral, neutral stance, neutral openness; reads as longing, contemplation, sadness; style: whispered, monologue; average recording, no background noise; genuineness 1.7/6; vocal-burst blend 4.2/10; 10.6s, ZH.
ZH_B00052_S04527_W000044 · in -14.8 dBFS · gain -5.2 dB · emolia-03799
This chain comes from the one-sided rule: only Pain had to get where it was going, by at least 0.25. The other emotion was left completely free.
The chain starts with Pain around average — 0.54, higher than 54 % of clips in this corpus — and ends with it strongly present at 0.82, higher than 82 % of clips in this corpus. That is a total rise of 0.28.
Nothing was asked of the other axis, and in fact Astonishment Surprise drifts down from 0.89 to 0.52 (-0.37), which the rule did not require.
It takes 3 clips to get there. Clip to clip the moves are +0.17, then +0.10 — a fairly even climb, though some clips carry more of the change than others.
No single step is larger than the 0.25 cap, which is exactly what stops this being a jump cut: the change has to be spread across the clips instead of landing all at once.
Same speaker? No similarity score is available here — the emolia clips in this chain are not covered by either speaker-embedding store. The chain therefore rests on the corpus's own speaker/track labelling, which is not the same as a measured check.
Voice consistency: these clips are separate recordings joined together, and no voice-similarity check could be run for this sample, so there is no measurement of how closely the voices match. You may hear the voice shift between segments. Voice conversion has not been applied yet in this build. A planned pass will re-render every segment onto the first segment's voice, which removes this effect entirely.
3 clips · 28 s · en · emolia
k 3d_a -0.368d_b 0.276step_a 0.668step_b 0.173min_cos_consec —min_cos_anchor —dataset emolialang enspeaker EN_B00010_S03415track EN_B00010_S03415total 27.6slevel spread 0.7 dBmax seam 0.4 dB
Script — 3 chunks, 1 with a non-speech sound
Unchanged across all 3 clips: a young adult feminine voice · neutral-toned, fairly smooth, balanced body, good recording, brisk, normally alert, some disfluency, light breath
(slightly relaxed, moderately variable, average clarity, casual)So Ashton has put about $10,000 in this year. (ahem) He does not currently receive social security, but we keep his assets low just in case for the future. Since he has income, it seems like he could open a Roth IRA.
full caption & clip details
A young adult feminine voice; delivery is normally alert, brisk, slightly relaxed, moderately variable; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; average clarity, some disfluency, wide pitch range, light breath; affect is mildly positive, neutral stance, neutral openness; no dominant emotion; style: casual, conversational; good recording, no background noise; genuineness 2.3/6; vocal-burst blend 3.4/10; 12.9s, EN.
EN_B00010_S03415_W000018 · in -19.0 dBFS · gain -1.0 dB · emolia-00455
(infatuation· slightly relaxed, fairly steady, average clarity, conversational)Or 3B. However, a Roth IRA is not an employer sponsored plan, so it would be fine to have both.
full caption & clip details
A young adult feminine voice; delivery is normally alert, brisk, slightly relaxed, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; average clarity, some disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is mildly positive, neutral stance, neutral openness; reads as infatuation; style: conversational, casual; good recording, quiet background; genuineness 3.3/6; vocal-burst blend 2.8/10; 5.8s, EN.
EN_B00010_S03415_W000019 · in -18.7 dBFS · gain -1.3 dB · emolia-00455
(neutral tension, fairly steady, clear, casual)This one's from Pamela in Georgia. What is a good alternative to Microsoft Office 365 for a work from home person needing a product like this for typing?
full caption & clip details
A young adult feminine voice; delivery is normally alert, brisk, neutral tension, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, slightly bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; clear, some disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is mildly positive, neutral stance, neutral openness; no dominant emotion; style: casual, conversational; good recording, no background noise; genuineness 1.4/6; vocal-burst blend 2.4/10; 8.7s, EN.
EN_B00010_S03415_W000020 · in -18.3 dBFS · gain -1.7 dB · emolia-00455
Pride ↑ (unconstrained axis: Disappointment)k-B1-k3 · #7
This chain comes from the one-sided rule: only Pride had to get where it was going, by at least 0.25. The other emotion was left completely free.
The chain starts with Pride clearly present — 0.69, higher than 69 % of clips in this corpus — and ends with it at the very top of the corpus at 0.98, higher than 98 % of clips in this corpus. That is a total rise of 0.30.
Nothing was asked of the other axis, and in fact Disappointment drifts down from 0.98 to 0.39 (-0.59), which the rule did not require.
It takes 3 clips to get there. Clip to clip the moves are +0.18, then +0.12 — an even, steady climb — each clip carries about the same share.
No single step is larger than the 0.25 cap, which is exactly what stops this being a jump cut: the change has to be spread across the clips instead of landing all at once.
Same speaker? No similarity score is available here — the emolia clips in this chain are not covered by either speaker-embedding store. The chain therefore rests on the corpus's own speaker/track labelling, which is not the same as a measured check.
Voice consistency: these clips are separate recordings joined together, and no voice-similarity check could be run for this sample, so there is no measurement of how closely the voices match. You may hear the voice shift between segments. Voice conversion has not been applied yet in this build. A planned pass will re-render every segment onto the first segment's voice, which removes this effect entirely.
3 clips · 53 s · zh · emolia
k 3d_a -0.589d_b 0.298step_a 0.556step_b 0.176min_cos_consec —min_cos_anchor —dataset emolialang zhspeaker ZH_B00077_S00711track ZH_B00077_S00711total 53.2slevel spread 1.5 dBmax seam 1.3 dB
Script — 3 chunks, 0 with a non-speech sound
Unchanged across all 3 clips: a young adult feminine voice · fairly smooth, thin, average recording, quiet background, normally alert, slightly relaxed, some disfluency, light breath
This chain comes from the one-sided rule: only Emotional Numbness had to get where it was going, by at least 0.25. The other emotion was left completely free.
The chain starts with Emotional Numbness around average — 0.56, higher than 56 % of clips in this corpus — and ends with it strongly present at 0.84, higher than 84 % of clips in this corpus. That is a total rise of 0.28.
Nothing was asked of the other axis, and in fact Infatuation drifts down from 0.87 to 0.65 (-0.22), which the rule did not require.
It takes 3 clips to get there. Clip to clip the moves are +0.10, then +0.17 — a fairly even climb, though some clips carry more of the change than others.
No single step is larger than the 0.25 cap, which is exactly what stops this being a jump cut: the change has to be spread across the clips instead of landing all at once.
Same speaker? The least similar clip scores 0.88 against the first clip, where 1.00 would mean an identical voice. That is above the 0.80 threshold the mining used — very likely one person. Neighbouring clips score at worst 0.92 against each other.
Voice consistency: these clips are separate recordings joined together, matching at 0.88. You may notice the voice shift a little between segments. Voice conversion has not been applied yet in this build. A planned pass will re-render every segment onto the first segment's voice, which removes this effect entirely.
Unchanged across all 3 clips: a child masculine voice · neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, average recording, quiet background, normally alert, slightly relaxed, some disfluency
(normal-paced, fairly steady, average clarity, monologue)Med mig i studio har jag är skribent och FRP-politiker Maria Seler. Hun är historisk och blir ett sistingsvald. Den första transpersonen som har valt till Storting är riktigt och som trädje vara för oss FRP.
full caption & clip details
A child masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, normal-paced, slightly relaxed, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; average clarity, some disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is neutral, neutral stance, slightly guarded; no dominant emotion; style: monologue, authoritative; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 1.7/6; vocal-burst blend 3.8/10; 15.1s, SV.
855522_00017480 · in -25.4 dBFS · gain +5.4 dB · podcast-06106
(fast, fairly steady, somewhat unclear, casual)Politiker har blivit spodd en framtidig ledstärna och är i FRP. Här är politisk nestleder i oslof
full caption & clip details
A young adult masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, fast, slightly relaxed, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, slightly thin; somewhat unclear, some disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is neutral, neutral stance, slightly guarded; no dominant emotion; style: casual, monologue; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 2.8/6; vocal-burst blend 5.6/10; 8.0s, SV.
855522_00018988 · in -26.2 dBFS · gain +6.2 dB · podcast-05504
(brisk, moderately variable, average clarity, casual)och bli från olikan stämtin som vara i central styra på lands möta. Det har ju
full caption & clip details
A young adult masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, brisk, slightly relaxed, moderately variable; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; average clarity, some disfluency, wide pitch range, light breath; affect is mildly positive, slightly dominant, slightly guarded; no dominant emotion; style: casual, conversational; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 3.9/6; vocal-burst blend 6.1/10; 6.0s, SV.
855522_00019780 · in -25.7 dBFS · gain +5.7 dB · podcast-05492
This chain comes from the one-sided rule: only Embarrassment had to get where it was going, by at least 0.20. The other emotion was left completely free.
The chain starts with Embarrassment strongly present — 0.79, higher than 79 % of clips in this corpus — and ends with it at the very top of the corpus at 1.00, virtually no clip in this corpus scores higher. That is a total rise of 0.20.
Nothing was asked of the other axis, and in fact Fear drifts down from 0.99 to 0.67 (-0.33), which the rule did not require.
It takes 3 clips to get there. Clip to clip the moves are +0.11, then +0.10 — an even, steady climb — each clip carries about the same share.
No single step is larger than the 0.25 cap, which is exactly what stops this being a jump cut: the change has to be spread across the clips instead of landing all at once.
Same speaker? The least similar clip scores 0.19 against the first clip, where 1.00 would mean an identical voice. That is below the 0.80 threshold the mining used — treat the “same speaker” claim here with caution. Neighbouring clips score at worst 0.22 against each other.
Voice consistency: these clips are separate recordings joined together and the match is loose (0.19, under the 0.80 threshold), so the voice may audibly change between segments. Voice conversion has not been applied yet in this build. A planned pass will re-render every segment onto the first segment's voice, which removes this effect entirely.
Unchanged across all 3 clips: a young adult feminine voice · neutral-toned, fairly smooth, average recording, quiet background, neutral tension, moderately variable, some disfluency, average clarity
(fear, confusion, doubt · normal-paced, very low-energy, normal breath, casual)Angie can kick rocks. I can't with Whitney. I cannot. Her voice and like I can literally see how slow the wills turn in her head. She's like, what, Lisa? But but (surprised gasp) uh like it's just like I don't compute like I can't with her. I I can't. You know
full caption & clip details
A young adult feminine voice; delivery is very low-energy, normal-paced, neutral tension, moderately variable; timbre is neutral-toned, slightly bright, fairly smooth, slightly thin; average clarity, some disfluency, wide pitch range, normal breath; affect is positive, slightly submissive, neutral openness; reads as fear, confusion, doubt; style: casual, conversational; average recording, quiet background; mildly explicit content; genuineness 3.8/6; vocal-burst blend 3.6/10; 19.4s, EN.
1945_00829352 · in -27.2 dBFS · gain +7.2 dB · podcast-00388
(infatuation, amusement, jealousy and envy·brisk, energised, light breath, casual)realize. (ahem) Up until
full caption & clip details
A young adult masculine voice; delivery is energised, brisk, neutral tension, moderately variable; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; average clarity, some disfluency, wide pitch range, light breath; affect is positive, slightly dominant, neutral openness; reads as infatuation, amusement, jealousy and envy; style: casual, conversational; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 5.5/6; vocal-burst blend 8.0/10; 18.0s, EN.
1945_00831320 · in -25.0 dBFS · gain +5.0 dB · podcast-02105
(embarrassment, doubt, pride·normal-paced, energised, light breath, casual)I'm like, oh, more, please. But (low mumble) um I I think I figured it out, at least in my mind. Like I know, Candy, you have always said how the other girls are very jealous of her, which I believe is true also.
full caption & clip details
A young adult masculine voice; delivery is energised, normal-paced, neutral tension, moderately variable; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; average clarity, some disfluency, wide pitch range, light breath; affect is positive, slightly dominant, neutral openness; reads as embarrassment, doubt, pride; style: casual, conversational; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 5.0/6; vocal-burst blend 6.5/10; 13.4s, EN.
1945_00833424 · in -25.4 dBFS · gain +5.5 dB · podcast-05846
Anger ↑ (unconstrained axis: Pride)k-B1-k3 · #10
This chain comes from the one-sided rule: only Anger had to get where it was going, by at least 0.20. The other emotion was left completely free.
The chain starts with Anger strongly present — 0.76, higher than 76 % of clips in this corpus — and ends with it at the very top of the corpus at 0.99, higher than 99 % of clips in this corpus. That is a total rise of 0.24.
Nothing was asked of the other axis, and in fact Pride drifts down from 0.99 to 0.91 (-0.08), which the rule did not require.
It takes 3 clips to get there. Clip to clip the moves are +0.03, then +0.20 — a slow start, with most of the change arriving in the final step.
No single step is larger than the 0.25 cap, which is exactly what stops this being a jump cut: the change has to be spread across the clips instead of landing all at once.
Same speaker? Not directly measured. What does exist is a timbre similarity of 0.19 against the first clip, which describes how alike the voices sound rather than whether they are the same person. It sits on a different scale from the identity check (corpus-wide the timbre numbers run much higher), so it cannot be read against the 0.80 identity threshold and is given here without a pass or fail.
Voice consistency: these clips are separate recordings joined together. Speaker identity was not measured for this sample; the available timbre similarity of 0.19 says the voices sound broadly alike but is not a same-person check. You may notice the voice shift between segments. Voice conversion has not been applied yet in this build. A planned pass will re-render every segment onto the first segment's voice, which removes this effect entirely.
3 clips · 34 s · fr · emolia
k 3d_a -0.079d_b 0.236step_a 0.461step_b 0.204min_cos_consec —min_cos_anchor —dataset emolialang frspeaker FR_845xJJDmQ9gtrack FR_845xJJDmQ9gtotal 34.2slevel spread 1.5 dBmax seam 1.1 dB
Script — 3 chunks, 3 with a non-speech sound
Unchanged across all 3 clips: a young adult masculine voice · neutral-toned, quiet background, normally alert, some disfluency
A young adult masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, brisk, neutral tension, moderately variable; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; average clarity, some disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is mildly positive, slightly submissive, slightly guarded; reads as pride, triumph, sourness; style: conversational, casual; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 4.9/6; vocal-burst blend 10.0/10; 16.9s, FR.
FR_845xJJDmQ9g_W000020 · in -14.4 dBFS · gain -5.6 dB · emolia-02871
(confusion·normal-paced, slightly relaxed, fairly steady, casual)(low mumble) l'un de moi impacte bien, sur le plan, (ahem) (ahem) euh, sur le plan économique.
full caption & clip details
A young adult masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, normal-paced, slightly relaxed, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, dark, slightly rough, thin; somewhat unclear, some disfluency, moderate pitch range, audible breath; affect is neutral, slightly dominant, slightly guarded; reads as confusion; style: casual, conversational; below-average recording, quiet background; genuineness 4.9/6; vocal-burst blend 3.8/10; 4.4s, FR.
FR_845xJJDmQ9g_W000021 · in -15.4 dBFS · gain -4.6 dB · emolia-02871
(anger, confusion, malevolence malice· normal-paced, neutral tension, moderately variable, conversational)sur la table. Nous, on a des amis qui étaient là-bas, comme Birahim Sek. Y'a pas de loi qui a encore été discutée. Y'a pas de clé de répartition qui a encore été (low mumble) définie.
full caption & clip details
An adult masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, normal-paced, neutral tension, moderately variable; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, slightly rough, balanced body; somewhat unclear, some disfluency, wide pitch range, light breath; affect is neutral, slightly dominant, slightly guarded; reads as anger, confusion, malevolence malice; style: conversational, authoritative; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 3.8/6; vocal-burst blend 4.2/10; 12.7s, FR.
FR_845xJJDmQ9g_W000023 · in -15.8 dBFS · gain -4.2 dB · emolia-02871
This chain comes from the one-sided rule: only Infatuation had to get where it was going, by at least 0.25. The other emotion was left completely free.
The chain starts with Infatuation clearly present — 0.60, higher than 60 % of clips in this corpus — and ends with it at the very top of the corpus at 0.93, higher than 93 % of clips in this corpus. That is a total rise of 0.33.
Nothing was asked of the other axis, and in fact Helplessness drifts down from 0.96 to 0.76 (-0.20), which the rule did not require.
It takes 3 clips to get there. Clip to clip the moves are +0.24, then +0.10 — a fairly even climb, though some clips carry more of the change than others.
No single step is larger than the 0.25 cap, which is exactly what stops this being a jump cut: the change has to be spread across the clips instead of landing all at once.
Same speaker? The least similar clip scores 0.87 against the first clip, where 1.00 would mean an identical voice. That is above the 0.80 threshold the mining used — very likely one person. Neighbouring clips score at worst 0.87 against each other.
Voice consistency: these clips are separate recordings joined together, matching at 0.87. You may notice the voice shift a little between segments. Voice conversion has not been applied yet in this build. A planned pass will re-render every segment onto the first segment's voice, which removes this effect entirely.
3 clips · 30 s · en · podcast
k 3d_a -0.202d_b 0.332step_a 0.555step_b 0.236min_cos_consec 0.8734min_cos_anchor 0.8734dataset podcastlang enspeaker 931638track 931638total 29.9slevel spread 3.0 dBmax seam 2.4 dBcos from recomputed from spkemb_traj
Script — 3 chunks, 1 with a non-speech sound
Unchanged across all 3 clips: an adult masculine voice · neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body, average recording, quiet background, normal-paced, normally alert
(thankfulness gratitude, helplessness, emotional numbness · slightly relaxed, fairly steady, average clarity, casual)it doesn't really matter what courses you've done, like I'm doing NLP now, and you'll always be who you are as a coach.
full caption & clip details
An adult masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, normal-paced, slightly relaxed, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; average clarity, frequent disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is neutral, neutral stance, neutral openness; reads as thankfulness gratitude, helplessness, emotional numbness; style: casual, conversational; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 4.7/6; vocal-burst blend 3.3/10; 5.9s, EN.
931638_00174912 · in -25.6 dBFS · gain +5.6 dB · podcast-02398
(sourness, anger, contempt·neutral tension, moderately variable, somewhat unclear, casual)That's why I don't mind people say the market's saturated, I'm like, not even close. I don't mind as well. I've had (low mumble) um fellow life coaches on my podcast. I'm gonna get more on. I don't mind standing shoulder to shoulder to them. I mean, you're a coach as well in a different aspect, but yeah,
full caption & clip details
An adult masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, normal-paced, neutral tension, moderately variable; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; somewhat unclear, frequent disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is mildly negative, neutral stance, slightly guarded; reads as sourness, anger, contempt; style: casual, conversational; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 5.5/6; vocal-burst blend 9.0/10; 16.9s, EN.
931638_00175512 · in -26.2 dBFS · gain +6.2 dB · podcast-04522
(infatuation, amusement·slightly relaxed, fairly steady, somewhat unclear, casual)competition because whoever wants to be coached by me will be coached by me because they'll relate to me, you know. I
full caption & clip details
An adult masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, normal-paced, slightly relaxed, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; somewhat unclear, frequent disfluency, moderate pitch range, normal breath; affect is neutral, neutral stance, neutral openness; reads as infatuation, amusement; style: casual, conversational; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 5.0/6; vocal-burst blend 2.7/10; 6.8s, EN.
931638_00177424 · in -28.6 dBFS · gain +8.6 dB · podcast-02411
This chain comes from the one-sided rule: only Sourness had to get where it was going, by at least 0.20. The other emotion was left completely free.
The chain starts with Sourness strongly present — 0.76, higher than 76 % of clips in this corpus — and ends with it at the very top of the corpus at 1.00, virtually no clip in this corpus scores higher. That is a total rise of 0.24.
Nothing was asked of the other axis, and in fact Bitterness climbs from 0.94 to 0.99 (+0.05), which the rule did not require.
It takes 3 clips to get there. Clip to clip the moves are +0.21, then +0.03 — most of the change happening immediately, then levelling off.
No single step is larger than the 0.25 cap, which is exactly what stops this being a jump cut: the change has to be spread across the clips instead of landing all at once.
Same speaker? The least similar clip scores 0.78 against the first clip, where 1.00 would mean an identical voice. That is below the 0.80 threshold the mining used — treat the “same speaker” claim here with caution. Neighbouring clips score at worst 0.83 against each other.
Voice consistency: these clips are separate recordings joined together and the match is loose (0.78, under the 0.80 threshold), so the voice may audibly change between segments. Voice conversion has not been applied yet in this build. A planned pass will re-render every segment onto the first segment's voice, which removes this effect entirely.
Unchanged across all 3 clips: a young adult masculine voice · slightly cool, thin, moderately variable
(bitterness, anger, pride · brisk, energised, neutral tension, cartoonish)just so you understand how it is we're going to cover when we start studying on the 21st okay what God is saying first of all that prophet Hosea was a prophet that was called during an inconvenient time much like the prophets of the old testament so much so he was going through so much that he was called while his wife was committing adultery so not only did he have to deliver God's word
full caption & clip details
A young adult masculine voice; delivery is energised, brisk, neutral tension, moderately variable; timbre is slightly cool, neutral-bright, slightly rough, thin; average clarity, some disfluency, wide pitch range, light breath; affect is mildly negative, slightly dominant, fairly guarded; reads as bitterness, anger, pride; style: cartoonish, dramatic; below-average recording, some background noise; genuineness 2.9/6; vocal-burst blend 6.5/10; 22.9s, EN.
298210_00451512 · in -28.0 dBFS · gain +8.0 dB · podcast-02270
(bitterness, anger, disappointment· brisk, energised, neutral tension, dramatic)okay he had to deliver it while he had other fleshly things on his mind that were just you know that that that were messing with him you know here you are trying to be a prophet to the to to God and and (surprised gasp) a prophet from God and at the same time your wife is out committing adultery and that scripture when he said he said my people will perish through the lack of knowledge what God is saying is not directed at the saints God was saying that to the priest
full caption & clip details
A young adult masculine voice; delivery is energised, brisk, neutral tension, moderately variable; timbre is slightly cool, neutral-bright, rough, thin; average clarity, some disfluency, wide pitch range, light breath; affect is mildly negative, slightly dominant, fairly guarded; reads as bitterness, anger, disappointment; style: dramatic, monologue; below-average recording, quiet background; genuineness 3.0/6; vocal-burst blend 7.7/10; 26.9s, EN.
298210_00453802 · in -26.6 dBFS · gain +6.6 dB · podcast-02262
(impatience and irritability, sourness, pride·fast, highly aroused, slightly relaxed, cartoonish)because he was telling them because you failed to go ahead and train equip and disciple my people
full caption & clip details
A child masculine voice; delivery is highly aroused, fast, slightly relaxed, moderately variable; timbre is slightly cool, very dark, rough, thin; slurred, frequent disfluency, very wide pitch range, audible breath; affect is elated, neutral stance, guarded; reads as impatience and irritability, sourness, pride; style: cartoonish, dramatic; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 1.2/6; vocal-burst blend 0.8/10; 9.8s, EN.
298210_00456486 · in -30.9 dBFS · gain +10.8 dB · podcast-02283
This chain comes from the one-sided rule: only Infatuation had to get where it was going, by at least 0.20. The other emotion was left completely free.
The chain starts with Infatuation clearly present — 0.70, higher than 70 % of clips in this corpus — and ends with it at the very top of the corpus at 0.97, higher than 97 % of clips in this corpus. That is a total rise of 0.27.
Nothing was asked of the other axis, and in fact Contemplation barely moves at all, sitting near 0.98 throughout.
It takes 3 clips to get there. Clip to clip the moves are +0.17, then +0.10 — an even, steady climb — each clip carries about the same share.
No single step is larger than the 0.25 cap, which is exactly what stops this being a jump cut: the change has to be spread across the clips instead of landing all at once.
Same speaker? Not directly measured. What does exist is a timbre similarity of 0.87 against the first clip, which describes how alike the voices sound rather than whether they are the same person. It sits on a different scale from the identity check (corpus-wide the timbre numbers run much higher), so it cannot be read against the 0.80 identity threshold and is given here without a pass or fail.
Voice consistency: these clips are separate recordings joined together. Speaker identity was not measured for this sample; the available timbre similarity of 0.87 says the voices sound broadly alike but is not a same-person check. You may notice the voice shift between segments. Voice conversion has not been applied yet in this build. A planned pass will re-render every segment onto the first segment's voice, which removes this effect entirely.
3 clips · 33 s · en · emolia
k 3d_a -0.021d_b 0.274step_a 0.065step_b 0.170min_cos_consec —min_cos_anchor —dataset emolialang enspeaker EN_B00059_S01107track EN_B00059_S01107total 32.9slevel spread 0.8 dBmax seam 0.8 dB
Script — 3 chunks, 0 with a non-speech sound
Unchanged across all 3 clips: a middle-aged masculine voice · neutral-toned, balanced body, slightly relaxed, fairly steady
(contemplation, distress, disappointment · slow, very low-energy, frequent disfluency, monologue)Real problems with not just how we talk about Jesus, but even believing
full caption & clip details
A middle-aged masculine voice; delivery is very low-energy, slow, slightly relaxed, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, slightly dark, fairly smooth, balanced body; somewhat unclear, frequent disfluency, fairly narrow pitch, normal breath; affect is mildly negative, neutral stance, neutral openness; reads as contemplation, distress, disappointment; style: monologue, whispered; good recording, no background noise; genuineness 0.9/6; vocal-burst blend 1.8/10; 5.9s, EN.
EN_B00059_S01107_W000015 · in -13.9 dBFS · gain -6.1 dB · emolia-01383
(awe, contemplation ·measured, normally alert, some disfluency, casual)Right? So that Jesus, Jesus is going around doing miracles, kinda with the same power the apostles would have later.
full caption & clip details
An adult masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, measured, slightly relaxed, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; average clarity, some disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is mildly positive, neutral stance, neutral openness; reads as awe, contemplation; style: casual, monologue; good recording, quiet background; genuineness 2.1/6; vocal-burst blend 1.7/10; 8.4s, EN.
EN_B00059_S01107_W000016 · in -13.1 dBFS · gain -6.9 dB · emolia-01383
(infatuation, concentration, contemplation · measured, normally alert, some disfluency, whispered)Or, no, he's not really a person. No, we want to, we want to leave both intact when we say the blood of Jesus purifies us from all sins. We confess his full human nature and his full divine nature and say that they are both at work contributing the unique attributes to the person, right?
full caption & clip details
An adult masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, measured, slightly relaxed, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, slightly rough, balanced body; somewhat unclear, some disfluency, fairly narrow pitch, normal breath; affect is mildly negative, slightly dominant, slightly guarded; reads as infatuation, concentration, contemplation; style: whispered, monologue; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 1.5/6; vocal-burst blend 2.9/10; 18.3s, EN.
EN_B00059_S01107_W000017 · in -13.9 dBFS · gain -6.1 dB · emolia-01383
Pride ↑ (unconstrained axis: Anger)k-B1-k3 · #14
This chain comes from the one-sided rule: only Pride had to get where it was going, by at least 0.20. The other emotion was left completely free.
The chain starts with Pride clearly present — 0.68, higher than 68 % of clips in this corpus — and ends with it at the very top of the corpus at 0.99, higher than 99 % of clips in this corpus. That is a total rise of 0.31.
Nothing was asked of the other axis, and in fact Anger barely moves at all, sitting near 0.95 throughout.
It takes 3 clips to get there. Clip to clip the moves are +0.17, then +0.14 — an even, steady climb — each clip carries about the same share.
No single step is larger than the 0.25 cap, which is exactly what stops this being a jump cut: the change has to be spread across the clips instead of landing all at once.
Same speaker? The least similar clip scores 0.25 against the first clip, where 1.00 would mean an identical voice. That is below the 0.80 threshold the mining used — treat the “same speaker” claim here with caution. Neighbouring clips score at worst 0.25 against each other.
Voice consistency: these clips are separate recordings joined together and the match is loose (0.25, under the 0.80 threshold), so the voice may audibly change between segments. Voice conversion has not been applied yet in this build. A planned pass will re-render every segment onto the first segment's voice, which removes this effect entirely.
Unchanged across all 3 clips: an adult masculine voice · neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body, quiet background, neutral tension, some disfluency, light breath
(anger, disgust, interest · normal-paced, normally alert, moderately variable, casual)all the inversion that has converting in a ROI null, if it's negative.
full caption & clip details
An adult masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, normal-paced, neutral tension, moderately variable; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; somewhat unclear, some disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is neutral, neutral stance, slightly guarded; reads as anger, disgust, interest; style: casual, conversational; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 5.0/6; vocal-burst blend 10.0/10; 11.4s, EN.
829953_00028244 · in -23.3 dBFS · gain +3.3 dB · podcast-03465
(hope enthusiasm optimism, interest, pleasure ecstasy·brisk, energised, moderately variable, casual)Correcto. Va un poco encadenada ahí. Te puede dar innovación, te puede dar actualidad, ¿no? Hoy en día, (ahem) de pronto tener una application se vuelve como esto que está este como en boga, ¿no? Como en su momento fue el tener una página web. Pero no específicamente tal vez es una application, ¿no? Que es justamente el tema que tocabas. ¿Por qué yo la quería? Pensemos, y es lo que te lo voy a regresar con una
full caption & clip details
A young adult masculine voice; delivery is energised, brisk, neutral tension, moderately variable; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; somewhat unclear, some disfluency, wide pitch range, light breath; affect is neutral, slightly dominant, slightly guarded; reads as hope enthusiasm optimism, interest, pleasure ecstasy; style: casual, dramatic; below-average recording, quiet background; genuineness 5.0/6; vocal-burst blend 10.0/10; 22.2s, EN.
829953_00037360 · in -24.8 dBFS · gain +4.8 dB · podcast-01978
(pride, anger, jealousy and envy· brisk, normally alert, fairly steady, monologue)pregunta. ¿Por qué yo quiero tener una application? ¿Qué me da una application que no me dé un web app? No, por ejemplo, me da personalización. ¿Por qué? Porque lo que yo tengo in my dispositivo sale es único para mí, ¿no? Yo tengo un celular de cierto color, con ciertas características, y con ciertas (low mumble)
full caption & clip details
A young adult masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, brisk, neutral tension, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; average clarity, some disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is neutral, slightly dominant, slightly guarded; reads as pride, anger, jealousy and envy; style: monologue, authoritative; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 4.1/6; vocal-burst blend 8.6/10; 21.0s, EN.
829953_00039584 · in -20.2 dBFS · gain +0.2 dB · podcast-03459
This chain comes from the one-sided rule: only Concentration had to get where it was going, by at least 0.20. The other emotion was left completely free.
The chain starts with Concentration clearly present — 0.73, higher than 73 % of clips in this corpus — and ends with it at the very top of the corpus at 0.99, higher than 99 % of clips in this corpus. That is a total rise of 0.26.
Nothing was asked of the other axis, and in fact Hope Enthusiasm Optimism drifts down from 0.97 to 0.82 (-0.15), which the rule did not require.
It takes 3 clips to get there. Clip to clip the moves are +0.14, then +0.12 — an even, steady climb — each clip carries about the same share.
No single step is larger than the 0.25 cap, which is exactly what stops this being a jump cut: the change has to be spread across the clips instead of landing all at once.
Same speaker? Not directly measured. What does exist is a timbre similarity of 0.86 against the first clip, which describes how alike the voices sound rather than whether they are the same person. It sits on a different scale from the identity check (corpus-wide the timbre numbers run much higher), so it cannot be read against the 0.80 identity threshold and is given here without a pass or fail.
Voice consistency: these clips are separate recordings joined together. Speaker identity was not measured for this sample; the available timbre similarity of 0.86 says the voices sound broadly alike but is not a same-person check. You may notice the voice shift between segments. Voice conversion has not been applied yet in this build. A planned pass will re-render every segment onto the first segment's voice, which removes this effect entirely.
3 clips · 53 s · en · emolia
k 3d_a -0.152d_b 0.261step_a 0.104step_b 0.140min_cos_consec —min_cos_anchor —dataset emolialang enspeaker EN_r3Qi2hymMF8track EN_r3Qi2hymMF8total 53.2slevel spread 1.0 dBmax seam 1.0 dB
Script — 3 chunks, 3 with a non-speech sound
Unchanged across all 3 clips: a young adult masculine voice · neutral-toned, fairly smooth, balanced body, average recording, quiet background, normally alert, slightly relaxed, fairly steady
(hope enthusiasm optimism, elation, interest · brisk, casual, playful)Yeah, absolutely. So with the launch of our new product, (ahem) uh, Docker Enterprise Container Cloud, we're making two subscriptions available as well, uh, (low mumble) (ahem) um, named Prod Care, which is a 24 seven mission critical support offering.
full caption & clip details
A young adult masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, brisk, slightly relaxed, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, slightly bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; average clarity, some disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is mildly positive, neutral stance, slightly guarded; reads as hope enthusiasm optimism, elation, interest; style: casual, playful; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 2.6/6; vocal-burst blend 2.2/10; 13.2s, EN.
EN_r3Qi2hymMF8_W000007 · in -16.5 dBFS · gain -3.5 dB · emolia-02194
(interest, pride, hope enthusiasm optimism ·normal-paced, monologue)And, (ahem) uh, Opscare being a fully managed platform as a service, uh, (low mumble) um, subscription. Now these, these offerings have been available on the Mirantis cloud platform side of the, of our, of our business for quite some time. We've been very successful with them. So it's really excited making them available to our Docker enterprise customers. (low mumble) Um, so.
full caption & clip details
A young adult masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, normal-paced, slightly relaxed, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; average clarity, some disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is mildly positive, neutral stance, slightly guarded; reads as interest, pride, hope enthusiasm optimism; style: monologue; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 2.9/6; vocal-burst blend 3.0/10; 20.8s, EN.
EN_r3Qi2hymMF8_W000008 · in -17.5 dBFS · gain -2.5 dB · emolia-02194
(concentration, interest · normal-paced, casual, monologue)What we, what we're trying to achieve with these accounts are (low mumble) with the, with these, uh, (ahem) subscriptions rather, you know, (ahem) uh, 30% of the, the Fortune 100 companies are Mirantis, (ahem) uhm, uh, customers. So we will work on a day-to-day basis with them with their container and Kubernetes initiatives. So when we speak to these customers,
full caption & clip details
An adult masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, normal-paced, slightly relaxed, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; average clarity, some disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is mildly positive, neutral stance, slightly guarded; reads as concentration, interest; style: casual, monologue; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 2.7/6; vocal-burst blend 2.0/10; 18.8s, EN.
EN_r3Qi2hymMF8_W000009 · in -17.4 dBFS · gain -2.6 dB · emolia-02194
Fear ↑ (unconstrained axis: Pride)k-B1-k3 · #16
This chain comes from the one-sided rule: only Fear had to get where it was going, by at least 0.25. The other emotion was left completely free.
The chain starts with Fear clearly present — 0.73, higher than 73 % of clips in this corpus — and ends with it at the very top of the corpus at 1.00, virtually no clip in this corpus scores higher. That is a total rise of 0.26.
Nothing was asked of the other axis, and in fact Pride drifts down from 0.77 to 0.24 (-0.53), which the rule did not require.
It takes 3 clips to get there. Clip to clip the moves are +0.23, then +0.03 — most of the change happening immediately, then levelling off.
No single step is larger than the 0.25 cap, which is exactly what stops this being a jump cut: the change has to be spread across the clips instead of landing all at once.
Same speaker? No similarity score is available here — the emolia clips in this chain are not covered by either speaker-embedding store. The chain therefore rests on the corpus's own speaker/track labelling, which is not the same as a measured check.
Voice consistency: these clips are separate recordings joined together, and no voice-similarity check could be run for this sample, so there is no measurement of how closely the voices match. You may hear the voice shift between segments. Voice conversion has not been applied yet in this build. A planned pass will re-render every segment onto the first segment's voice, which removes this effect entirely.
3 clips · 11 s · en · emolia
k 3d_a -0.534d_b 0.264step_a 0.534step_b 0.230min_cos_consec —min_cos_anchor —dataset emolialang enspeaker EN_wTo0-i_xavQtrack EN_wTo0-i_xavQtotal 11.1slevel spread 0.9 dBmax seam 0.9 dB
Script — 3 chunks, 0 with a non-speech sound
Unchanged across all 3 clips: an adult masculine voice · neutral-toned, balanced body, average recording, quiet background, normally alert, slightly relaxed, fairly steady, some disfluency
(normal-paced, light breath, casual, conversational)And could potentially turn one into a zombie
full caption & clip details
An adult masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, normal-paced, slightly relaxed, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; average clarity, some disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is neutral, neutral stance, slightly guarded; no dominant emotion; style: casual, conversational; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 3.4/6; vocal-burst blend 2.3/10; 3.2s, EN.
EN_wTo0-i_xavQ_W000004 · in -16.3 dBFS · gain -3.7 dB · emolia-00717
(fear, helplessness, distress· normal-paced, light breath, casual, authoritative)The fungus essentially feeds on the brain of the victim.
full caption & clip details
An adult masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, normal-paced, slightly relaxed, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; average clarity, some disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is neutral, slightly dominant, slightly guarded; reads as fear, helplessness, distress; style: casual, authoritative; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 3.4/6; vocal-burst blend 1.2/10; 3.5s, EN.
EN_wTo0-i_xavQ_W000006 · in -15.4 dBFS · gain -4.6 dB · emolia-00717
(fear, disgust, distress ·measured, normal breath, casual, storytelling)And since more disturbing than the scariest horror film.
full caption & clip details
An adult masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, measured, slightly relaxed, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, slightly dark, slightly rough, balanced body; average clarity, some disfluency, moderate pitch range, normal breath; affect is neutral, slightly dominant, neutral openness; reads as fear, disgust, distress; style: casual, storytelling; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 2.4/6; vocal-burst blend 2.0/10; 4.0s, EN.
EN_wTo0-i_xavQ_W000008 · in -15.9 dBFS · gain -4.1 dB · emolia-00717
This chain comes from the one-sided rule: only Hope Enthusiasm Optimism had to get where it was going, by at least 0.20. The other emotion was left completely free.
The chain starts with Hope Enthusiasm Optimism clearly present — 0.73, higher than 73 % of clips in this corpus — and ends with it at the very top of the corpus at 0.97, higher than 97 % of clips in this corpus. That is a total rise of 0.25.
Nothing was asked of the other axis, and in fact Contemplation drifts down from 0.92 to 0.72 (-0.19), which the rule did not require.
It takes 3 clips to get there. Clip to clip the moves are +0.13, then +0.12 — an even, steady climb — each clip carries about the same share.
No single step is larger than the 0.25 cap, which is exactly what stops this being a jump cut: the change has to be spread across the clips instead of landing all at once.
Same speaker? The least similar clip scores 0.92 against the first clip, where 1.00 would mean an identical voice. That is a strong match — almost certainly one person throughout. Neighbouring clips score at worst 0.95 against each other.
Voice consistency: these clips are separate recordings joined together. The measured match is tight (0.92), so any shift should be subtle — but you may still notice the voice change slightly from segment to segment. Voice conversion has not been applied yet in this build. A planned pass will re-render every segment onto the first segment's voice, which removes this effect entirely.
Unchanged across all 3 clips: an adult masculine voice · neutral-toned, neutral-bright, slightly rough, balanced body, average recording, quiet background, brisk, subdued
(contemplation · slightly tense, casual, monologue)somebody somewhere is looking at you, needs you, needs your example, needs your, you know, your positivity, your energy, in order to give them an example that they may not have had, even if you haven't had that example yourself. You know what I mean?
full caption & clip details
An adult masculine voice; delivery is subdued, brisk, slightly tense, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, slightly rough, balanced body; somewhat unclear, some disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is neutral, slightly dominant, slightly guarded; reads as contemplation; style: casual, monologue; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 4.5/6; vocal-burst blend 9.1/10; 14.6s, EN.
872020_00504576 · in -24.0 dBFS · gain +4.0 dB · podcast-03004
(contemplation, interest, teasing·neutral tension, casual, conversational)Try to be that example if you haven't had that example. Find the example if you need an example. There's some some male somewhere around that you can glean from. Don't be don't be too proud to say, Hey man, how'd you learn how to do this? Where'd you get that? You know what I mean? You know.
full caption & clip details
An adult masculine voice; delivery is subdued, brisk, neutral tension, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, slightly rough, balanced body; somewhat unclear, some disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is mildly negative, slightly dominant, fairly guarded; reads as contemplation, interest, teasing; style: casual, conversational; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 5.1/6; vocal-burst blend 9.7/10; 15.0s, EN.
872020_00506035 · in -22.8 dBFS · gain +2.8 dB · podcast-03003
(hope enthusiasm optimism, elation, malevolence malice· neutral tension, casual, conversational)have the right attitude, have the right (ahem) uh approach and perspective, be humble, (ahem) uh you know, be teachable, be coachable, w however you want to put it, but just have the right attitude and approach towards life and people will gravitate towards you, people will respond to you. You'll see yourself get us get so much further. Nobody's an island. None of us got here because we were so great.
full caption & clip details
An adult masculine voice; delivery is subdued, brisk, neutral tension, fairly steady; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, slightly rough, balanced body; somewhat unclear, some disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is mildly negative, slightly dominant, fairly guarded; reads as hope enthusiasm optimism, elation, malevolence malice; style: casual, conversational; average recording, quiet background; genuineness 4.6/6; vocal-burst blend 8.4/10; 23.6s, EN.
872020_00510016 · in -22.0 dBFS · gain +2.0 dB · podcast-03957
This chain comes from the one-sided rule: only Astonishment Surprise had to get where it was going, by at least 0.25. The other emotion was left completely free.
The chain starts with Astonishment Surprise around average — 0.52, higher than 52 % of clips in this corpus — and ends with it at the very top of the corpus at 0.95, higher than 95 % of clips in this corpus. That is a total rise of 0.43.
Nothing was asked of the other axis, and in fact Interest drifts down from 0.88 to 0.57 (-0.31), which the rule did not require.
It takes 3 clips to get there. Clip to clip the moves are +0.23, then +0.20 — an even, steady climb — each clip carries about the same share.
No single step is larger than the 0.25 cap, which is exactly what stops this being a jump cut: the change has to be spread across the clips instead of landing all at once.
Same speaker? The least similar clip scores 0.15 against the first clip, where 1.00 would mean an identical voice. That is below the 0.80 threshold the mining used — treat the “same speaker” claim here with caution. Neighbouring clips score at worst 0.15 against each other.
Voice consistency: these clips are separate recordings joined together and the match is loose (0.15, under the 0.80 threshold), so the voice may audibly change between segments. Voice conversion has not been applied yet in this build. A planned pass will re-render every segment onto the first segment's voice, which removes this effect entirely.
3 clips · 44 s · en · podcast
k 3d_a -0.312d_b 0.427step_a 0.346step_b 0.229min_cos_consec 0.1480min_cos_anchor 0.1539dataset podcastlang enspeaker 635847track 635847total 43.6slevel spread 3.2 dBmax seam 3.2 dBcos from recomputed from spkemb_traj
Script — 3 chunks, 2 with a non-speech sound
Unchanged across all 3 clips: a young adult masculine voice · balanced body, quiet background
(measured, normally alert, relaxed, casual)I wanted to bring up the movie (low mumble) uh with uh (low mumble) Mark Wahlberg, what is it called? Uh (low mumble) the infinite, right? Those that are aware of past lifetimes, right?
full caption & clip details
A young adult masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, measured, relaxed, fairly steady; timbre is slightly cool, slightly dark, fairly smooth, balanced body; somewhat unclear, frequent disfluency, moderate pitch range, normal breath; affect is neutral, neutral stance, neutral openness; no dominant emotion; style: casual, conversational; below-average recording, quiet background; genuineness 4.8/6; vocal-burst blend 0.0/10; 11.0s, EN.
635847_00657032 · in -21.4 dBFS · gain +1.4 dB · podcast-01185
(intoxication altered states of consciousness, fear, confusion· measured, very low-energy, relaxed, casual)(ahem) The incident. Oh, yeah. I mean, there's all kinds of stuff to explore with this. I mean, because again, you know, if you recognize there's some kind of spiritual warfare going on, and there's some higher purpose to everything we're in right now. You know, for some they go down the simulation theory path, some, you know, like me, it's flat earth. (low mumble) Um, some you know, find in various ways, but
full caption & clip details
A young adult masculine voice; delivery is very low-energy, measured, relaxed, moderately variable; timbre is neutral-toned, dark, slightly rough, balanced body; somewhat unclear, frequent disfluency, moderate pitch range, light breath; affect is mildly positive, slightly submissive, slightly guarded; reads as intoxication altered states of consciousness, fear, confusion; style: casual, monologue; below-average recording, quiet background; genuineness 5.7/6; vocal-burst blend 5.7/10; 24.2s, EN.
635847_00658152 · in -23.4 dBFS · gain +3.4 dB · podcast-01188
(astonishment surprise, confusion ·normal-paced, normally alert, neutral tension, casual)all about the Alex Jones that I heard back in 2002. That shit seems exactly what's happening right now.
full caption & clip details
A young adult masculine voice; delivery is normally alert, normal-paced, neutral tension, moderately variable; timbre is neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body; average clarity, some disfluency, wide pitch range, light breath; affect is neutral, neutral stance, neutral openness; reads as astonishment surprise, confusion; style: casual, conversational; average recording, quiet background; mildly explicit content; genuineness 5.4/6; vocal-burst blend 3.6/10; 8.1s, EN.
635847_00660632 · in -20.2 dBFS · gain +0.2 dB · podcast-01206
Shame ↑ (unconstrained axis: Doubt)k-B1-k3 · #19
This chain comes from the one-sided rule: only Shame had to get where it was going, by at least 0.25. The other emotion was left completely free.
The chain starts with Shame around average — 0.50, right about the corpus median — and ends with it at the very top of the corpus at 0.93, higher than 93 % of clips in this corpus. That is a total rise of 0.43.
Nothing was asked of the other axis, and in fact Doubt drifts down from 0.91 to 0.83 (-0.08), which the rule did not require.
It takes 3 clips to get there. Clip to clip the moves are +0.22, then +0.21 — an even, steady climb — each clip carries about the same share.
No single step is larger than the 0.25 cap, which is exactly what stops this being a jump cut: the change has to be spread across the clips instead of landing all at once.
Same speaker? No similarity score is available here — the emolia clips in this chain are not covered by either speaker-embedding store. The chain therefore rests on the corpus's own speaker/track labelling, which is not the same as a measured check.
Voice consistency: these clips are separate recordings joined together, and no voice-similarity check could be run for this sample, so there is no measurement of how closely the voices match. You may hear the voice shift between segments. Voice conversion has not been applied yet in this build. A planned pass will re-render every segment onto the first segment's voice, which removes this effect entirely.
3 clips · 12 s · ja · emolia
k 3d_a -0.080d_b 0.428step_a 0.099step_b 0.220min_cos_consec —min_cos_anchor —dataset emolialang jaspeaker JA_B00002_S01918track JA_B00002_S01918total 12.2slevel spread 2.9 dBmax seam 1.8 dB
Script — 3 chunks, 0 with a non-speech sound
Unchanged across all 3 clips: an adult masculine voice · neutral-toned, neutral-bright, fairly smooth, balanced body, good recording, no background noise, normally alert, slightly relaxed
This chain comes from the one-sided rule: only Hope Enthusiasm Optimism had to get where it was going, by at least 0.25. The other emotion was left completely free.
The chain starts with Hope Enthusiasm Optimism clearly present — 0.63, higher than 63 % of clips in this corpus — and ends with it at the very top of the corpus at 0.94, higher than 94 % of clips in this corpus. That is a total rise of 0.31.
Nothing was asked of the other axis, and in fact Astonishment Surprise drifts down from 0.96 to 0.89 (-0.07), which the rule did not require.
It takes 3 clips to get there. Clip to clip the moves are +0.23, then +0.08 — most of the change happening immediately, then levelling off.
No single step is larger than the 0.25 cap, which is exactly what stops this being a jump cut: the change has to be spread across the clips instead of landing all at once.
Same speaker? No similarity score is available here — the emolia clips in this chain are not covered by either speaker-embedding store. The chain therefore rests on the corpus's own speaker/track labelling, which is not the same as a measured check.
Voice consistency: these clips are separate recordings joined together, and no voice-similarity check could be run for this sample, so there is no measurement of how closely the voices match. You may hear the voice shift between segments. Voice conversion has not been applied yet in this build. A planned pass will re-render every segment onto the first segment's voice, which removes this effect entirely.
3 clips · 36 s · zh · emolia
k 3d_a -0.065d_b 0.306step_a 0.117step_b 0.229min_cos_consec —min_cos_anchor —dataset emolialang zhspeaker ZH_B00048_S05861track ZH_B00048_S05861total 35.8slevel spread 1.5 dBmax seam 1.4 dB
Script — 3 chunks, 0 with a non-speech sound
Unchanged across all 3 clips: a child feminine voice · neutral-bright, fairly smooth, average recording, no background noise, normally alert, slightly relaxed, moderately variable, some disfluency